On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:36:24PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > emacsen-common (2.0.8) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * Require add-on packages to depend on emacsen-common >= 2.0.8. This > should be simpler and safer, and emacsen-common is only ~140k, which > shouldn't be too big a burden.
Hi, Rob, I see that you finally went for the emacsen-common dependency as lesser evil, fine. While I would have preferred avoiding the dependency, I admit that we could not find something simple and rock solid to deal with the underlying problems without it. One question here, does the dependency really needs to be this tight? I mean, would emacsen-common (>= 2.0.5) be enough? That is the emacsen-common version in unstable and would help a lot with use of newer add-on packages in stable. Regards, -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
