tags 563300 +pending
thanks
Hi,

     The following change has been committed for this bug by
 Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@golden-gryphon.com> on Wed, 14 May 2014 10:57:44 
-0700.
 The fix will be in the next upload. 
=========================================================================
[master]: various bug fixes

* No longer have generated kernel images depend on ksymoops, a long
  defunct package, since it is useless with kernels >= 2.6.
  (Closes: #748066).
* When the user asks for the arch name to be part of the kernel image
  package version string, only image and debig packages included the
  arch in the name. This commit makes the name of the header package
  also be consistent with the image names. At this point, the source and
  document/manual package names remain generic, since arch specific
  differences should not exist in those packages. (Closes: #568576).
* the image packages generated by kernel-package also build in the
  modules requested in the configuration file, so there is no
  linux-moules-* package. However, in case there are dependencies on
  that package name, the image package now also claims to provide the
  modules package. (Closes: #599815).
* In order to ease the life of people cross compiling, or building for a
  subarch, do not call dpkg-gencontrol with the host archtecture, but
  rather, with the architecture we built the kernel image for.
  (Closes: #563300).
* Hopped on to an armel machine to test make-kpkg. The CPU is reported
  as arm by dpkg-architecture, so the top level logic in kernel-package
  was correct.Unfortunately, the armel specific file wassumed the CPU
  was armel, so nothing got included.  Corrected that inner check in
  this release.  (Closes: #664854).

Signed-off-by: Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@golden-gryphon.com>
=========================================================================


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to