Le Fri, 09 May 2014 18:21:32 +0200, Hilko Bengen <ben...@hilluzination.de> a écrit :
> * Laurent Bigonville: > > > I would be tempted to say that a cluster filesystem is not for > > "usual installations" at all. For the other local file systems I've > > no objections, but this one seems to be pulling quite some > > dependencies and daemons like corosync/openais (high availability > > software) and seems pretty specialized to me. > > I do see your point... > > The other set of dependencies about which there have been complaints > is those for zfs. > > I guess that most people will want to look at typical Linux, Windows, > and Mac images. so all components usually used to inspect those should > stay recommended: -hfsplus, -xfs. Everything else would only be > suggested: -gfs2, -jfs, -nilfs, -rescue, -rsync, -zfs. > > Does that sound like a plan? Sounds good to me :) Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
