* Laurent Bigonville: > I would be tempted to say that a cluster filesystem is not for "usual > installations" at all. For the other local file systems I've no > objections, but this one seems to be pulling quite some dependencies > and daemons like corosync/openais (high availability software) and > seems pretty specialized to me.
I do see your point... The other set of dependencies about which there have been complaints is those for zfs. I guess that most people will want to look at typical Linux, Windows, and Mac images. so all components usually used to inspect those should stay recommended: -hfsplus, -xfs. Everything else would only be suggested: -gfs2, -jfs, -nilfs, -rescue, -rsync, -zfs. Does that sound like a plan? Cheers, -Hilko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
