On 05/08/2014 02:43 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> According to upstream, this is not limited to VirtualBox, and also
> affects QEMU 0.11.1. It is reported to have been fixed in syslinux
> 6.03-pre5:

yes, i'm aware of that. however.. my original plan was (quoting from irc):

09:43:18 < dba> Ady2: syslinux finally left new; so.. plan is to upload
the current 6.03~pre1 to unstable in two weeks,
09:43:40 < dba> and then have newest 6.03~pre in experimental again and
deal with the gnu-efi transition there.
09:58:48 < Ady2> dba: TY. BTW and FWIW, 6.03-pre11 has _many_
improvements over pre1. And gnu-efi needs to be updated (so to be able
to be dealt with).
09:59:27 < dba> Ady2: yes, but i can't upload ~pre11 without fixing the
gnu-efi thing first
09:59:48 < Ady2> I understand.
10:00:17 < dba> and i'd prefer having ~pre1 in unstable in two weeks,
and ~pre11 in experimental at that time.
10:00:50 < Ady2> sounds reasonable.
10:00:54 < dba> otherwise we can't really fix issues once
debian-cd/debian-installer switches to syslinux 6 (which they do with
the upload to unstable)

i would expect to do the gnu-efi transition within one day, like..
uploading ~pre3-1 to unstable on 17th, latest ~pre to experimental on
the 18th, and if all stuff still builds everywhere, upload that to
unstable on 19th/20th.

the idea was to be extra cautious and upload pre3-1 first to unstable,
since it has only a few bugs and they are known, rather than the latest
pre available on the 17th to avoid surprises.

i could cherry pick this particular fix though.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:          [email protected]
Internet:       http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to