I'd be happy to push the netcdfc package to alioth tomorrow. Do cdftools and flexpart require the Fortran or C++ bindings as well? (Those are now separate packages.)
Cheers, Nico On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Alastair McKinstry <alastair.mckins...@sceal.ie> wrote: > > On 03/05/2014 21:18, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> >> GCC 4.9 changes the module version for fortran 90 code from 10 to 12. A test >> rebuild of GCC 4.9 only shows good results when a package doesn't >> build-depend >> on another package having the same gfortran module version. Asking first the >> maintainers of gfortran based software to test-rebuild these packages, then >> giving feedback about the viability of gfortran-4.9 as the default gfortran >> version for jessie. >> >> So please build the build-dependencies of these packages, and then these >> packages themself with gfortran-4.9. >> >> cdftools >> elkcode >> flexpart >> slepc > > cdftools and flexpart depend on netcdf, which is currently at 4.1.3. > In mail > <cak6z60c2+myo_s0qejzomjrwszmbgcu2_kzpwmw67a-pgbb...@mail.gmail.com> > to debian-devel, Nico Schlomer points out he is packaging the lastest > netcdf, 4.3.2, which > has reorganised netcdf significantly and is testing it. > So perhaps it would be good to synchronise these changes. I will upload > new versions > of cdftools and flexpart when netcdf has moved to 4.3.2+ > > >> Please follow-up with results to this bug report. >> >> > > -- > Alastair McKinstry, <alast...@sceal.ie>, <mckins...@debian.org>, > https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry > A decent provision for the poor is the true test of civilization. > ~Samuel Johnson, Boswell: Life of Johnson > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
