On Sunday, February 09, 2014 04:20:07 PM Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: > > I'm a bit puzzled by that patch: > > > > Don't you need to mark the (optional) build-dependencies as such? > > I don't see anything in the patch touch debian/control though. > > > > Could you elaborate how this is supposed to work? > > I looked at a couple of other patches before merging this, and the > common theme was that the changes to debian/rules came first, and > debian/control will be touched later. I think this is/was due to the > fact that the debian/control changes were not standardized at the > point. I am not sure about the current status, i.e. whether it’s > safe/wise to change d/control yet.
Oh, I forgot to mention in my last mail: the way you'd use the new stage1 build profile is something like: dpkg-buildpackage -Pstage1 -d -uc -us -b If you could put the new Build-Depends syntax into debian/control, that would make the -d flag unnecessary; but... Oh, well. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
