On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:01:16 -0500 (EST), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > The "microcode version in sysfs doesn't get updated" bug was fixed on stable > > kernels 3.12.10 and 3.13.2. It was not fixed on long-term-service kernel > > 3.10.29 or earlier kernels, however I am not sure the issue can happen > > before kernel 3.11. > > OK, thanks for all your hard work. I'm finally ready for you to close this > bug > report. Thank you for your patience.
It will remain open, as the report was actually about the kernel "skipping" the logging of side-effect-updated cores, and that bug remains. The whole sysfs issue was a second problem that caused extra confusion on top of the original bug report :-) > > For the record, I've confirmed that the other issue (cpus don't log when > > they have been updated as a side-effect of the update of a different cpu) > > also happen for some Intel processors, kernel 3.10.29. > > So it's consistent. Sort of. Indeed it is. Fixing it would require changes to the microcode core, not just the Intel and AMD backend drivers. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
