Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > I agree with Ian on this. At this point, it should be clear to everyone > that, given the stated preferences of each member of the TC, the default > init system for jessie will be systemd.
Let's finish that vote then and move on. > But I do not think this is the most important aspect of the problem > that needs to be decided. The question of how, or if, multiple init > systems will coexist in the Debian archive for jessie is what needs to > be decided in order to unblock maintainers and give them clarity for > their own packages. That is an entirely separate issue. I agree that it is important and needs to be resolved, but the Technical Committee is the wrong place to be designing this policy. We must (by 6.3.5) not engage in design of new proposals and policies. Yes, as individuals, we may choose to collaborate with others on the development of a suitable policy, and that group may well decide that they cannot reach a consensus and bring the issue back to the Technical Committee for advice. Please stop trying to bypass the constitutional process for policy design. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpO6TE2T0qde.pgp
Description: PGP signature
