On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 09:31:12PM +1300, schmitz wrote: > > I can add ppc64el, but someone else will need to compile it even on > powerpc - my toolchain is in a truly sorry state.
I could NMU-with-consent, or even add myself to Uploaders and co- maintain, if you'd be okay with that? Given the upload history, I get the impression it's mostly self-maintaining anyway, but it wouldn't hurt to bring it up to current packaging/toolchain/etc standards, and I'd be happy to do that. > I'll look into the epoch thing - do I need to conflict on > powerpc-ibm-utils as well? Nope. We're carrying both (just as Debian is), we just accidentally got an inflated version number when someone took an IBM wishlist "please upgrade to new version" bug at face value without looking closely enough, and I had to revert: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-utils/1.2.18+r1.1.3-24ubuntu1 > Thanks for pointing out that powerpc-ibm-utils has already been > packaged. I'll try to keep that in mind for the next odd wishlist > request in a few year's time. Packaged, and orphaned. I think I'll rescue -ibm-utils while I'm on this warpath, and make sure the world's in good shape. ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
