Hi Adam,
I can add ppc64el, but someone else will need to compile it even on
powerpc - my toolchain is in a truly sorry state.
I'll look into the epoch thing - do I need to conflict on
powerpc-ibm-utils as well?
Thanks for pointing out that powerpc-ibm-utils has already been
packaged. I'll try to keep that in mind for the next odd wishlist
request in a few year's time.
Cheers,
Michael
Package: powerpc-utils
Severity: normal
It would be lovely if you added ppc64el to the arch list for powerpc-utils
to enable building on that new port (already in Ubuntu, and likely to show
up in debian-ports at some point in the not-too-distant future).
Also, while this is a bit of a strange request, I'd love it if you could
add an epoch to the version to help your downstreams (namely us, *sigh*)
skip over a versioning snafu where someone accidentally "upgraded" powerpc-
utils to powerpc-ibm-utils and I had to revert it.
... Adam
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers trusty-updates
APT policy: (500, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 'trusty-security'), (500, 'trusty')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-7-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
