Hi Tianon,
Tianon Gravi <admwig...@gmail.com> writes:
> I tested that the packages build and install successfully on Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD amd64 with nothing more than the attached patch (which is
> pretty minor itself - just adding the necessary "Architectures" and
> "${go:Hostos}" to match "${go:Hostarch}").
>
> If there's a different preferred format (or a different method of sending
> the patch entirely), I'm very willing to adapt. I'm also willing to run
> any kinds of tests deemed necessary. Just let me know!
Thanks for experimenting with this and posting your results.
What is required for this patch to be merged is not a one-time
experiment, but a written statement about support in maintaining this
from at least an individual person (you?) or, preferably, a team (the
kFreeBSD porters?). The duties I am thinking about involve fixing FTBFS
in a timely fashion on kfreebsd-* and handling _all_ bugreports that are
reported on that architecture.
The reason why I’m asking for this is that I don’t run kFreeBSD anywhere
and I also don’t intend to change that in the near- to medium-term
future. Therefore, adding support for this without someone who will take
care of the kFreeBSD problems would not be a good idea at all :).
--
Best regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
