Hi Bastien, On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:51:20PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > For me it is a worthwhile goal reduce archive size.
When moving files within a package there is no reduction in size. That is precisely why the goal did not seem worthwhile to me. In any case it is not substantial. We are talking about a few kb if anything. Space is not a reasonable argument here, sorry. On the other hand the Debian policy discourages the use of embedded code copies. The main reason here is that the work to fix a bug in the code is amplified by the number of embedded copies. > No because with a few script line we could render jquery backward > compatible. We do not care about doxygen. > > We load recent jquery and we add some compatibility layer see > https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate/blob/master/README.md While it may be possible to make jquery backwards compatible, that's not the goal here. The goal for Doxygen would be to make the embedded file called jquery.js backwards compatible. These are two very different goals, because (I repeat) what is called jquery.js is not jquery, but happens to also contain jquery. None of your past mails show that you have understood the scope of the problem. Please take a bit more time and think things through before replying. I am not opposed to solving the embedding issue, but I do not yet see, how you intend to solve it. Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
