On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:06:15PM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote: > From e751078fb9a532a3e8ef411e88d95adbe05ea0a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Michael Vogt <m...@debian.org> > Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 21:36:26 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 2/4] add pyflakes test > > --- > tests/test_pyflakes.py | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tests/test_pyflakes.py > > diff --git a/tests/test_pyflakes.py b/tests/test_pyflakes.py > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..7404987 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/test_pyflakes.py > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ > +#!/usr/bin/python3 > +# -*- Mode: Python; indent-tabs-mode: nil; tab-width: 4; coding: utf-8 -*- > + > +# Partly based on a script from Review Board, MIT license; but modified to > +# act as a unit test.
You really need to include the original copyright statement and the license here, otherwise you violate the license. If the original code does not include the license or a copyright statement above it, it might not be distributable at all, as the license clearly says: The *above* copyright notice and *this permission notice* shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. (I just added some emphasis) I'd even say that including the copyright notice *below* the license terms is wrong, as the license clearly says *above*. But not including them is definitely wrong. We don't want legal issues. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. Please do not top-post if possible. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
