On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:04:47PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > (Addressed to Michael Vogt, so don't wonder, other Michael...) [..] > I thought we wanted to use git-dch now (meaning after I released 0.9.1) for > changelog manipulation. I did commit 56ed099558a9f6e7137a8c113ca9efb2b2c1a1d2 > without a changelog entry for that reason, but I see that you did the commit > afterwards with a changelog entry.
Indeed, sorry for this, I'm not used to this yet, but I agree that its a good idea and we should stick with git-dch. > It would also be cooler to have some more useful summary lines in > your commits. The last one just had "* apt/cache.py:". If you use > debcommit, you can use debcommit -e to adjust the summary. Again agreed, I was using debcommit and will be more carefull about this in the future. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
