> - The pear group does not work on this problem but have asked the PHP group > (!). > > - We wait since a year to have a change, after having discussed this > issue, it seems > that only the PHP related text "includes PHP" will be changed but > not "includes > Zend.."
There were also other problematic mentions of the PHP group and name. See my analysis at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00188.html It seems to me that this is an issue that the Pear group could address, independent of the PHP group. The reason is, the license is perfectly acceptable for PHP, simply not for anything else. For example, the Pear group could remove the PHP License from their list of acceptable licenses, and encourage all packages released under the PHP License to migrate to the practically equivilant BSD License. Are you able to bring this issue before the Pear group, or would it make sense for me to send another mass mailing list email? Thanks for your feedback on this matter. Charles -- Ashes to ashes Forests to dust Keep Minnesota green Or we'll All go bust Burma-Shave http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1949/ashes_to_ashes
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
