Hi KiBi, On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:42:59PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> (2013-11-28): > > Thanks for the quick response, attached the new debdiff mentioning the > > problem with munin-node. Can I go ahead with the upload? > > Looks nice, thanks!
Ok! Have uploaded it. > > > (Not planning to address the $peeraddr bit at some point?) > > > > Yes sure, can go also addressing that. But I would prefer to have the > > fix integrated upstream first, and in unstable (altough it is trivial > > to check first if value is defined ...; is this fine with you? Once > > this is done for unstable, I then could open a new pu request). > > I agree having an upstream fix would be nice (tested for a while in > unstable); no urgency, just wondering whether you had plans since it was > mentioned in the bug report. If nobody hits this issue, not fixing is > probably OK too… I have not seen any people mentioning this, apart Patrick having proposed his patch also with a fix for that. But I will ping upstream about the additional check, once it's in unstable we then can see :) Thanks again, Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
