On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 03:26:29PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:02:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> > >> - This system was a woody system somewhen (or testing/unstable with > >> packages as later released with woody), with the texdocrc file > >> belonging to the texdoctk package > > [snip] > > > > It was never a woody system exactly. It was installed with testing or > > unstable in January 2005, before sarge's release. > > And you never upgraded to one of the teTeX-2.9/3.0 versions in > experimental?
No. > No, it doesn't - if you installed testing or unstable in 2005 (or even > in 2004), texdoctk was already gone by then, and dpkg wouldn't know any > owner of the texdocrc file. I have no clue what is going on. FWIW this occurred in my amd64 installation, but my i386 chroot didn't have this issue. It was installed within a few weeks of the amd64. However I probably have not done any (or as much) purging in the chroot. (My i386 chroot did have the same problem with 00updmap.cfg btw.) Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
