On September 27, 2013 09:22:58 AM Kurt Roeckx wrote: > As far as I can see, it builds, it just fails in the test suite.
Sometimes the build itself fails but often it is indeed the test cases. However, I make no distinction: software that "builds" but doesn't run correctly is no more valuable than software that doesn't build. > Has anyone actually looked at why it failed? Sure, people have looked. The problem is nobody has fixed the failures. > we need to file bugs against the > reverse dependencies of this package. Agreed. -Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
