Am Mittwoch, den 04.09.2013, 00:04 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining: > Not necessarily for now. I just sponsor it if you are fine with that.
Yes, sure. > Is the coverage of the new gsfonts/fonts-urw as wide as the coverage > of the fonts currently in TeX Live? Or, in other words, is it a > complete replacement? I'd say it definitely *should* ;) The fonts have been provided by the same upstream as exact that, a drop-in replacement for the fonts shipped with ghostscript. I don't know, however, in how far texlive followed the urwcyr fork. If it did, the cyrillic glyphs will be missing. How can we check that? > IN this case I can arrange that in the next upload of TeX Live packages > we do *not* ship the fonts, but dpend on fonts-urw* and link to the > files. That was the idea, after all. I am still considering, by the way, to do what ghostscript did with the fonts and reset the font name and font family fields in the binary files to match those of the gsfonts release... - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
