Am Dienstag, den 03.09.2013, 20:06 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > Why? Sounds like a _very_ bad idea to me (no matter if others did > similar bad stuff in the past).
Because the font names may be hard coded somewhere (the internal FontName and FontFamily fields, I am not talking about the file names). This is how it looks for the current gsfonts package: ~/Debian/gsfonts-8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44$ grep -a 'FontName' *.pfb a010013l.pfb:/FontName /URWGothicL-Book def a010015l.pfb:/FontName /URWGothicL-Demi def a010033l.pfb:/FontName /URWGothicL-BookObli def a010035l.pfb:/FontName /URWGothicL-DemiObli def b018012l.pfb:/FontName /URWBookmanL-Ligh def b018015l.pfb:/FontName /URWBookmanL-DemiBold def b018032l.pfb:/FontName /URWBookmanL-LighItal def b018035l.pfb:/FontName /URWBookmanL-DemiBoldItal def c059013l.pfb:/FontName /CenturySchL-Roma def c059016l.pfb:/FontName /CenturySchL-Bold def c059033l.pfb:/FontName /CenturySchL-Ital def c059036l.pfb:/FontName /CenturySchL-BoldItal def d050000l.pfb:/FontName /Dingbats def n019003l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-Regu def n019004l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-Bold def n019023l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-ReguItal def n019024l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-BoldItal def n019043l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-ReguCond def n019044l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-BoldCond def n019063l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-ReguCondItal def n019064l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-BoldCondItal def n021003l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusRomNo9L-Regu def n021004l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusRomNo9L-Medi def n021023l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusRomNo9L-ReguItal def n021024l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusRomNo9L-MediItal def n022003l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusMonL-Regu def n022004l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusMonL-Bold def n022023l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusMonL-ReguObli def n022024l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusMonL-BoldObli def p052003l.pfb:/FontName /URWPalladioL-Roma def p052004l.pfb:/FontName /URWPalladioL-Bold def p052023l.pfb:/FontName /URWPalladioL-Ital def p052024l.pfb:/FontName /URWPalladioL-BoldItal def s050000l.pfb:/FontName /StandardSymL def z003034l.pfb:/FontName /URWChanceryL-MediItal def These are the values those fields carry since decades. Now, for the updated release, URW decided to slightly modify those fields: ~/Debian/fonts-urw-base35$ grep -a 'FontName' *.pfb a010013l.pfb:/FontName /URWGothic-Boo def a010015l.pfb:/FontName /URWGothic-Dem def a010033l.pfb:/FontName /URWGothic-BooObl def a010035l.pfb:/FontName /URWGothic-DemObl def b018012l.pfb:/FontName /BookmanURW-Lig def b018015l.pfb:/FontName /BookmanURW-DemBol def b018032l.pfb:/FontName /BookmanURW-LigIta def b018035l.pfb:/FontName /BookmanURW-DemBolIta def c059013l.pfb:/FontName /CenturySchURW-Rom def c059016l.pfb:/FontName /CenturySchURW-Bol def c059033l.pfb:/FontName /CenturySchURW-Ita def c059036l.pfb:/FontName /CenturySchURW-BolIta def d050000l.pfb:/FontName /Dingbats def n019003l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSan-Reg def n019004l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSan-Bol def n019023l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSan-Ita def n019024l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSan-BolIta def n019043l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanNar-Reg def n019044l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanNar-Bol def n019063l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanNar-Ita def n019064l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanNar-BolIta def n021003l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusRom-Reg def n021004l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusRom-Med def n021023l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusRom-Ita def n021024l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusRom-MedIta def n022003l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusMon-Reg def n022004l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusMon-Bol def n022023l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusMon-Obl def n022024l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusMon-BolObl def p052003l.pfb:/FontName /PalladioURW-Rom def p052004l.pfb:/FontName /PalladioURW-Bol def p052023l.pfb:/FontName /PalladioURW-Ita def p052024l.pfb:/FontName /PalladioURW-BolIta def s050000l.pfb:/FontName /StandardSymL def z003034l.pfb:/FontName /ChanceryURW-MedIta def I am afraid these FontNames are expected and have even found them hard-coded in texlive. Thus, I am considering to reset these fields back to the values of the gsfonts package. Ghostscript has already done this for the fonts in the Resource/Font directory to circumvent that exact issue. They did also rename the font file names, but this is not what I am talking about. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
