Package: r-cran-rcpparmadillo
Version: 0.3.810.2-1
Severity: important

Hi.

The current scenario with respect to r-cran-rcpparmadillo and regular
armadillo is less than optimal, since the armadillo code is
essentially duplicated. I would request that r-cran-rcpparmadillo use
libarmadillo-dev, and we can coordinate the uploads to Debian using
one of these approaches:

1. You can take up co-maintenance or even full maintenance of
armadillo, so that it is easy for you to ensure that uploads get done.

2. You can inform me when you intend to upload r-cran-rcpparmadillo
and find that armadillo is out of date. I am fairly responsive, so I
can usually get back within a couple of days.

Please let me know your opinion.

Thanks!

Kumar

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Kumar Appaiah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to