On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Jan Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay ... I was talking here about pu in general, not php specific. >
As I understand from some d-d discussion, we could be a little bit more aggressive with pu now. > > Okay ... we should have had talked a bit much more about this topic. > With suhosin abounded upstream, I didn't follow your packaging very > close, so I wasn't aware of the issue (as the change was on your side, > I would have wished you pinged me). > Anyways, there was also the #662637-debacle, so this messed the > situation more than needed. The Breaks was added to prevent a gazillion of: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680145 type of bugs filled. (Which would happen.) Anyways ... looking into > https://github.com/stefanesser/suhosin/issues/20#issuecomment-15631909 > and even in > https://github.com/stefanesser/suhosin/issues/27#issuecomment-18741064 > makes me cautiously optimistic. > I won't believe it until I see the code. Empty promises cost nothing. O. -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
