On 2013-04-02 Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote: [...] > +binary-makedeb/gnutls-bin:: DEB_DH_GENCONTROL_ARGS := -- > -v3.0.20-3+really$(DEB_VERSION)
> That would make version number in unstable go backwards. We really don't > want this. > Is there any reason not to use "3.0.22-3+really$(something-else)"? That > would be higher than the version in unstable. Hello, the rationale for this is that testing has 3.0.20, and therefore undoing the change and switching back to gnutls28 would be as easy as uploading a new gnutls28-source to tpu without any fancy versioning. I do not know whether this outweighs the version-downgrade. I am not hard-set on the chosen path and open to suggestions. Afaiui if I used 3.0.22-3+really... there would be no need at all to remove gnutls28 from unstable. - Can you confirm this? Thanks, cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
