Control: tag -1 moreinfo Andreas Metzler <ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org> writes: > please remove gnutls28 3.0.22-3 from unstable but keep the version in > experimental. > > We currently intend to drop gnutls28 from wheezy, since it is a leaf > package and creates non-neglible unnecessary work for > Debian-security. > > gnutls26 will provide the binary packages gnutls-bin and guile-gnutls > again (they are currently built from gnutls28.) I would like to do > this transition via unstable and therefore ask you to remove gnutls28 > 3.0.22-3 (source and binary) from unstable. This is is necessary since > unstable has a newer version of gnutls28 than testing. > > See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.release/64871 > for details.
In the patch there I see: +binary-makedeb/gnutls-bin:: DEB_DH_GENCONTROL_ARGS := -- -v3.0.20-3+really$(DEB_VERSION) That would make version number in unstable go backwards. We really don't want this. Is there any reason not to use "3.0.22-3+really$(something-else)"? That would be higher than the version in unstable. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
