On 03/31/2013 06:04 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sonntag, 31. März 2013, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> OTOH I am pretty sure that the majority of people using wheezy's "dch >> --bpo" functionality will be generating backports for wheezy itself >> and not for oldstable. > > to me thats what I'd call "obvious behaviour" and "obvisouly sane behaviour". > If it wouldn't wheezy's (or actually,any releases) dch would break, once > oldstable (and therefore it's backports suite) will be moved to archive.d.o, > which will eventually happen. > > Also it seems more logical to create backports for the suite one is running, > and not an outdated suite. > > > cheers, > Holger
Unless someone opposes to my view, I think we have a majority to agree that dch --bpo should use wheezy, and that this really is a bug. So I will open a new bug to ask the release team if they would accept such a change. Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
