On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:30:13AM +0200, Alessandro Polverini wrote: > I have similar problems without m-a :
Any special reason not to install m-a (besides the extra package to install)? Before the adaptation to m-a the package zaptel-source had the source of the module extracted. Now it is in a separate tarball, which makes building without m-a more complicated. > pc:/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7-smp# make-kpkg modules_image Are you sure that this is supposed to work? Why not simply (as a user, not even as root) : m-a -u . -t -l 2.6.12-1-k7 build zaptel Which is kind of a shorthand for: m-a -u . -t -k /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7 build zaptel But will not run over package-installed files. > /usr/bin/make \ > ARCH=i386 oldconfig > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7-smp' > scripts/Makefile.build:13: scripts/basic/Makefile: No such file or > directory > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `scripts/basic/Makefile'. Stop. > make[1]: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7-smp' > make: *** [stamp-kernel-configure] Error 2 > > Any clues? You need the full source tarball if you go that route, I guess. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
