Hello Josè, and thanks for your reply.
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 10:57 -0500, Santiago José Ruano Rincón wrote:
> El lun, 24-10-2005 a las 08:30 +0200, Alessandro Polverini escribió:
> > Any clues?
>
> I had not problems with make-kpkg
>
> $ sudo make-kpkg --added_modules zaptel modules_image
> [snip]
> ...
> rm -f ztcfg-shared fxstest
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/zaptel'
> #rm -f debian/manpage.links debian/manpage.refs debian/*.8
> dh_clean
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/zaptel'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/zaptel'
> Module /usr/src/modules/zaptel processed fine
Not mine :(
# make-kpkg --added_modules zaptel modules_image
/usr/bin/make \
ARCH=i386 oldconfig
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7-smp'
scripts/Makefile.build:13: scripts/basic/Makefile: No such file or
directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `scripts/basic/Makefile'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-k7-smp'
make: *** [stamp-kernel-configure] Error 2
> did you uncompressed the zaptel-sources tarball?
No, I installed zaptel-source that unpacks itself in /usr/src/modules,
right?
I tried to compile with module assistant and I got a bit further but
this time I got the error that I must install gcc-4.0 because that is
the compiler used to compile the kernel installed.
Are you using the linux-image from testing/unstable or using a custom
backport of the kernel?
If yes, can you explain me how to do it? I would do a backport of
2.6.13.x from experimental.
Thanks!
Alex
