19.03.2013 01:49, Helge Deller wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 03/12/2013 09:13 PM, Helge Deller wrote: >> On 03/09/2013 02:57 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> As Ian replied to your patch on autofs mailinglist, this is only needed for >>> old kernels, but he applies your patch anyway. I'd go for removing whole >>> hack entirely, maybe after a bit more waiting (say, when all major >>> distributions >>> will move on to the fixed kernel already), because whole thing is just >>> disgusting and hurt eyes. This hack, with or without your change, is >>> definitely not needed on Debian. >> >>> And if there is, it must be something else, because since the above >>> mentioned >>> commit, it all Just Works, and if there's a problem it is elsewhere. >> >> I'll check and try to dig deeper again next week when I'm back from >> vacation.. > > Ok, it seems the changes to bring the header file up to date in sync with > upstream kernel > is not even needed (since it's being built on parisc on 32bit userspace > only), but it > makes it consistent.
> The second part (the "if arch" check) can be dropped. Now I'm completely confused. So do we need any changes or not? Does it work as-is now or doesn't? Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
