On 1 March 2013 14:17, Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 March 2013 21:14, Dmitrijs Ledkovs <x...@debian.org> wrote: >> In Ubuntu, instead of applying the full patch against 1.49, we went >> for a minimalistic hack/patch to workaround TIME_UTC in eglibc-2.16. >> Simply undef TIME_UTC if defined. > > Is that expected to work for a program that uses both libboost-thread > and C11 date and time?
yes, as both have always evaluated to the same constant value on linux. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
