On 1 March 2013 11:45, Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 February 2013 15:40, Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The errors related to BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT are fixed upstream: >> >> <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7242> >> > > The upstream changeset associated with that includes unrelated changes > to the macro. Attached gcc4.8_trac-7242.patch includes only the fix > for the unused local typedef warnings. > > Fix is not yet in any released upstream version. > > Many unused local typedef warnings remain that do not appear to be > addressed upstream or cause the build to fail. > > >>> ./boost/thread/xtime.hpp:23:5: error: expected identifier >>> before numeric constant > > This is <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6940>. C11 > introduces a macro (TIME_UTC) that conflicts with a boost enum; the > macro is maybe present with eglibc-2.16 and later. Again, the > associated upstream changeset includes some unrelated. Attached > c11_trac-6490.patch includes only the fix for this enum issue. >
In Ubuntu, instead of applying the full patch against 1.49, we went for a minimalistic hack/patch to workaround TIME_UTC in eglibc-2.16. Simply undef TIME_UTC if defined. See atttached. Regards, Dmitrijs.
fix-ftbfs-glibc-2.16.patch
Description: Binary data
