On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 12:53:51 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Thanks Guillem for your patches. After the quick exchange with Russ this week > on this list,
Yeah, being able work on the appendices piecemeal will make it easier, otherwise it gets difficult to see what's done and what's pending, as long as the incremental changes are valid by themselves. > I agree to apply all of them except the one removing sections. > For the moment I would prefer to replace them by stubs. Would that be fine > for > you ? In that case, no need to send an updated patch, I alredy have a branch > ready where that change is done. It would be ok I guess, better than the current situation, although I don't really see the point in that. Those sections will end up being removed at some point anyway, that's why I updated the initial section to point to the dpkg man pages if any was missing, and as long as they do not get renumbered (something I took care of), that should not introduce confusion. Also, as an aside, I don't think any section should be removed, before the information therein has been moved to a correct place, like dpkg documentation, devref, maint-guide or the main policy itself, etc. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
