Le Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:30:23PM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit : > > I don't really see the point in that. Those sections will end up being > removed at some point anyway, that's why I updated the initial section > to point to the dpkg man pages if any was missing, and as long as they > do not get renumbered (something I took care of), that should not > introduce confusion.
Hi Guillem, I would prefer to avoid deleting sections and their anchors for the moment, so that the question of what to do with the anchors can be addressed at once. If there are no objections, I will apply the modified patches so that we can move forward. Or I can just push a branch I had a look at section D, and it would be straightforward to merge it in Chapter 5. To avoid renumbering, I propse that the section 5.8 (Obsolete fields) of the upcoming release will not be divided in sub-sections, but will rather be organised as an alphabetical list. This changes the current situation where the DM-Upload-Allowed field is described as section 5.8.1. Or do we need do distinguish obsolete fields that may be found and those that should not be found ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
