I have made the changes that you recommended so I'll just comment on a couple of things below.
> - Just wondering, does minetest 0.4.x actually still build with > libirrlicht-dev 1.7 in unstable? I tested the current version of > minetest in unstable when I uploaded irrlicht 1.8 to experimental, and > it ended up with a FTBFS (bug #693277). If minetest 0.4.x requires > irrlicht 1.8 rather than 1.7.x, please bump the build-depends on > libirrlicht-dev to (>= 1.8). Yes, minetest 0.4 builds correctly with both libirrlicht-dev 1.7 and 1.8 > - This is more just an opinion than anything else, but I don't really > think it's necessary to split the game data into minetest-game-minimal > and minetest-game-full. In debian/control, -minimal and -full are > always listed together in the package relationships (there's no > distinction between the two packages amongst the various relationships > between all the binary packages), and both packages are already quite > small in size. I just don't see any advantages to splitting them up > that offsets the added complexity to the source package. I had kept them in separate packages because upstream also keeps them separate but I suppose now that I actually think about it, putting them both in minetest-data is the more sensible idea. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
