On 2013-01-27 15:17, Neil Williams wrote: > I've tried reproducing this again in a VM with gnome-core installed and > again after installing gnome-dbg - without problems.
> Please can #677407 be re-tested using libglib2.0-0 > (= 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5) from unstable? squeeze/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:2.30+7.log wheezy/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log sid/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log squeeze2wheezy/main/affected/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log squeeze2wheezy2sid/main/affected/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log squeeze2sid/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log testing2sid/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log looks good :-) If there is a repository somewhere with all the new .debs built from source(libglib2.0-0) and a Packages file, I could do tests how this would look like in a squeeze2wheezy upgrade after glib2 migrated to testing. (I'm just to lazy to rebuild glib2 locally ...) Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
