On 16-01-2013 17:03, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Gökçen, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:52:35PM +0100, Gökçen Eraslan wrote: >>> >>> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/king/trunk/debian/king.install?r1=12798&r2=12797&pathrev=12798 >>> >>> ? >>> >> >> I think installing all png files in installer/ to /usr/share/pixmaps is >> pointless. > > Well, there are other packages installing different sizes. Installing > all sizes besides kingicon-orig.png costs less than extra 13kB. IMHO no > need to spend some real thought on it.
OK. > >> In my opinion it's better to just install a 64x64 king.png or >> king.xpm file, otherwise what is the purpose of keeping many png files >> in pixmaps/? > > I'm not that deep into desktop optimisation that I could say. I just was > looking into my /usr/share/pixmap and found several icons in different > sizes - so what? > >> I have attached the file I was mentioning and its xpm version. > > Well, Debian Menu wants exactly 32x32 xpm (I admit it is a bit > restricted, yes.) So if you really think I should only provide a single > resolution - that's fine for me. Just tell me and I will specify only > kingicon-orig.png. 32x32 is really small, indeed :) I'm not really familiar with Debian packaging so the decision is, of course, up to you. I don't know how strict are these Debian Menu rules, but again I would rather install a single 64x64 file. > > Thanks for your hints that are very welcome > You're welcome. Thank you for your interest. > Andreas. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
