Hi Gökçen,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:52:35PM +0100, Gökçen Eraslan wrote:
> >
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/king/trunk/debian/king.install?r1=12798&r2=12797&pathrev=12798
> >
> > ?
> >
>
> I think installing all png files in installer/ to /usr/share/pixmaps is
> pointless.
Well, there are other packages installing different sizes. Installing
all sizes besides kingicon-orig.png costs less than extra 13kB. IMHO no
need to spend some real thought on it.
> In my opinion it's better to just install a 64x64 king.png or
> king.xpm file, otherwise what is the purpose of keeping many png files
> in pixmaps/?
I'm not that deep into desktop optimisation that I could say. I just was
looking into my /usr/share/pixmap and found several icons in different
sizes - so what?
> I have attached the file I was mentioning and its xpm version.
Well, Debian Menu wants exactly 32x32 xpm (I admit it is a bit
restricted, yes.) So if you really think I should only provide a single
resolution - that's fine for me. Just tell me and I will specify only
kingicon-orig.png.
Thanks for your hints that are very welcome
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
