Hi, On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:14:38PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > To make that more clear. "UNO bootstrap" uses /usr/bin/soffice. That's why > it's there, I would more like to have it NOT in /usr/bin _at all_ as the name > already is misleading and is a remain from the prorietary *S*tar*Office*. > > But no, we need to keep it and we need to make sure it is the right one > for what we ship - what we do. (This is also why libreoffice-common conflicts > openoffice.org-common)
And to make it even more clear: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?h=libreoffice-4-0&qt=grep&q=API+CHANGE (as you see, this *will be* in LO 4.0 beginning of next year already) What are you doing with stuff using that accessing /usr/bin/soffice and assuming it's AOO which includes those obsolete API which would happen if soffice was an alternative? [1] Regards, Rene [1] There shouldn't be much using that (if at all), but it's the theory which counts.. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
