On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:02:38PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > b) not a bug in Debian in any case but a upstream one (it relies on > a /usr/bin/soffice anyways) [...] > - how do you ensure external API stuff (especially those using new > APIs/features introduced) uses the correct soffice? [...] > I don't think mangling a such-important thing like soffice is a good idea.
To make that more clear. "UNO bootstrap" uses /usr/bin/soffice. That's why it's there, I would more like to have it NOT in /usr/bin _at all_ as the name already is misleading and is a remain from the prorietary *S*tar*Office*. But no, we need to keep it and we need to make sure it is the right one for what we ship - what we do. (This is also why libreoffice-common conflicts openoffice.org-common) If you want to use a "soffice" wih AOO, yes, you need to remove LO and install OO. No one claimed those t wo are parallel-installable. /usr/bin/soffice is not the only thing which is in the way here, anyways. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
