On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:26:02AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:03:07 +0100, Csillag Tamas wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:30:27PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:17:15 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > ... 
> > > The problem is still that the name of the new tarball is only
> > > reported as a message by uscan which is not parsed by
> > > /usr/share/pyshared/gbp/deb/uscan.py if I'm reading ot correctly.
> > My previous patch works happily with the version in wheezy (and you are 
> > right
> > that I should have worked on the newest available version in the first 
> > place.)
> 
> Oh, just to clarify: My test was without your patch, just with the
> current gbp installed, as an answer to Guido's "shouldn't this work
> already?"

Okay just the patched version results in a much easier workflow and it solves
the problem for me so I will try to gently push it forward ;-)

Regards,
  cstamas
-- 
CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://cstamas.hu/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to