On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:03:07 +0100, Csillag Tamas wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:30:27PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:17:15 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > ... > > The problem is still that the name of the new tarball is only > > reported as a message by uscan which is not parsed by > > /usr/share/pyshared/gbp/deb/uscan.py if I'm reading ot correctly. > My previous patch works happily with the version in wheezy (and you are right > that I should have worked on the newest available version in the first place.)
Oh, just to clarify: My test was without your patch, just with the current gbp installed, as an answer to Guido's "shouldn't this work already?" Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #248: Too much radiation coming from the soil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
