I was absolutely sure that it didn't say "for windows," so I went back and got it to reproduce the message, and you're right about it being mono for windows. Sorry for the bother. You can close this bug.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Jo Shields <direct...@apebox.org> wrote: > On 10/12/12 16:28, Jesse Rhodes wrote: > >> One such application requires .net, and wine's console helpfully told me >> that I needed mono installed in order to use .net. I already had >> mono-runtime installed for amd64, so 'aptitude install mono-runtime:i386' >> is what got this party started. >> > > Nope. It told you to use Mono for Windows, inside Wine, to run a .NET app. > Subsequently the app should be runnable with "wine c:\mono\mono.exe > c:\foo\bar.exe" or somesuch. This is more cleanly integrated with modern > Wine. >
