Gergely Nagy wrote: > Another option could perhaps be to ship the files in /lib, but instead > of relying on UCF or some other kind of mechanism to fiddle with the > symlinks in /etc, ship files there too. Files that do nothing but > .include the file in /lib. > > Things like: > > .include /lib/systemd/system/foo.service > > The advantage of this is that the whole conffile handling is left up to > dpkg, no other mechanism is needed, neither in maintainer scripts, nor > elsewhere. Users can still modify the files, or even remove them: it > will be handled correctly. In most cases, they can even leave the > .include there, and just override the few things they need to override. > > (and dh_installinit could then perhaps assist with creating these > .include-only files automatically, based on what the package installs > under /lib/systemd)
Yes, it certianly could. Choice is entirely up to the systemd maintainers.. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
