On 2012-10-02 16:05:48 -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 11:55:23PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > *Any* user who chooses to reject mail based on an invalid DKIM signature > > > for any reason is making a mistake and will lose legitimate mail: > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dkim#Content_modification > > > > You're wrong. My mail server DOES NOT modify messages. > > But if you are only corresponding with other users of your mail server, > then why do you care about DKIM? DKIM signatures can be rendered invalid > elsewhere along the delivery path.
My mail server is reachable directly, and directly listed as the MX of my domains. So, if there is some other server along the delivery path for a personal mail, that's due to the sender of the message, e.g. because he uses a smarthost that modifies the mail, but in this case, the sender shouldn't use DKIM in the first place. > The KDIM test is not enabled by default and is clearly marked as > experimental in the config. In the config, but neither in the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM man page, nor in the spamassassin(1p) man page. This is where the user would look in the first place. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
