On 2012-10-02 09:29:57 -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:59:00PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > A user who configures his mail system (e.g. via procmail) to reject > > messages with T_DKIM_INVALID ends up in losing legitimate mail! > > *Any* user who chooses to reject mail based on an invalid DKIM signature > for any reason is making a mistake and will lose legitimate mail: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dkim#Content_modification
You're wrong. My mail server DOES NOT modify messages. > Ultimately, though I reset this bug's severity to 'important', I really > think this error is entirely cosmetic and the appropriate severity is > 'minor'. T_DKIM_INVALID does not, and should not, contribute to a > message's spam score by default. It is not cosmetic. What is the default doesn't matter. The point is that the user can have its own configuration. And if SpamAssassin says something, the user is in his own right to use this information. If the user shouldn't use the result of the T_DKIM_INVALID test, then shouldn't be there in the first place. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
