On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 02:40:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Ian Jackson wrote: > > But I'm not convinced that this is the right basis to think about it. > > It is not a good precedent to set that if a matter is brought to the > > TC, the maintainer who loses the debate in the TC will do something > > which undermines the effect of the TC decision and which wasn't > > proposed in the TC discussion. > > > > Having taken hold of the matter and overruled the maintainer, we have > > a responsibility to see through the consequences, and to avoid > > backsliding by the maintainer. > > http://bugs.debian.org/640874 > > $ apt-get source leave > [...] > $ head -n 1 leave-1.12/debian/rules > #!/bin/sh -e > > It seems pretty clear that the TC is currently not making sure that his > decisions get acted upon (and this despite Jakub who pointed out the > mistake in https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2012/08/msg00001.html).
Apologies for missing this. I've now sent that bug back to the leave maintainer. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
