Andreas Barth writes ("Re: Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome"):
> However, I'm not sure if 6. is too detailed, or should just be written
> as
> a. Any way which increases the likelihood of network-manager
> being installed (this includes also messages, user-face
> warnings etc)
6 was a list of the further ways I thought of to subvert the
decision. I do have the catch-all as well, so I think my list is
broader. I do think it's necessary to preempt sabotage of non-nm
gnome systems.
> Also the first sentence of 9. might need to be dropped. Perhaps adding
> something like "using words like 'crusade' together with implementing
> a tech ctte decision is inappropriate" might be better?
TBH I think it unlikely that enough of our colleagues will agree to
even 9. And it may be unnecessary, given the rest. I think 8 is
necessary.
I don't think mentioning the rude language in the TC resolution is
really appropriate.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
