On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 07:05:35PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: >>> We are still in the early freeze where riskier changes are allowable, aren't >>> we? >> >> No. There's no such thing as an early freeze that allows riskier changes this >> cycle. We might be convinced that certain delays in preparing a final package >> for the next release might have been someone else's fault, but that's no "go >> for risky changes". > > "Riskier" may not have been the best qualifier for me to choose to > describe this. The right term I should have used is "invasive." Is > it the release team's opinion that multiarch conversions at this point > are invasive (even though multiarch is a release goal)?
I'll also plead the case that I did have the work in before the freeze, but was blocked. The original multiarch nmu was uploaded to delayed/5 on June 16th (bug #675773), but it was canceled and blocked shortly thereafter. Then, I didn't get the go ahead to upload again until after the release team made a call on the 1.5 transition. I was busy the following days and didn't get to it again until July 2nd (two days after the freeze) when I uploaded to delayed/5. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
