retitle 681717 unblock: openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.5 thanks On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hello. > > Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com> (15/07/2012): >> Package: release.debian.org >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> Severity: normal >> >> Please unblock package openjpeg >> >> The unstable version enables multiarch and fixes a security issue. >> >> unblock openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.4 > > Waiting after the freeze has happened to introduce such changes really > isn't appreciated, especially when you get them wrong,
I agree. The situation with openjpeg is far from ideal. I was working on a lot of multiarch changes supporting wine, and this one got blocked for a while by people expecting the 1.5 transition to happen. Then the release team made the call on that a couple days before the freeze, at that point those opposing stopped opposing, and so I finally uploaded the multiarch nmu again to 1.3 but that was unfortunately late (two days after the freeze). You've probably already seen all the details of those discussions in #675773 and #669348. > That doesn't match: > 2. changes for release goals, if they are not invasive; Fortunately the multiarch conversion for this package was very straightforward and not very invasive, but I can understand your alternative perspective. We are still in the early freeze where riskier changes are allowable, aren't we? > Also, debhelper (>= 5) certainly isn't sufficient for those changes, is > it? I apologize for missing that. You are quite correct, that should have been bumped to 9 as well. I've just uploaded 1.3+dfsg-4.5 with that change. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
