Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump > the soname up to 3 in one of the releases. It is also very > hard for me to imagine any scenario where having multiple > versions of Leptonica installed at the same time makes sense.
Here's a patch on top of the one sent before to take this feedback into account. Sane? The shared library policy is your friend. Trust the shared library policy. :) Jonathan debian/changelog | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 51648488..6382ff33 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ leptonlib (1.69-3.1) local; urgency=low * Rename the libleptonica package to liblept3. (closes: #664176) - This way, liblept3 and old versions of libleptonica can be - installed at the same time to keep binaries linked against - liblept.so.1 working. + Otherwise, libleptonica from wheezy can satisfy dependencies by + packages in squeeze, producing "liblept.so.1: cannot open + shared object file" errors. * debian/control: liblept3 breaks and replaces libleptonica (>= 1.69~) to take over /usr/lib/liblept.so.3. - -- Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:34:26 -0500 + -- Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:39:14 -0500 leptonlib (1.69-3) unstable; urgency=low -- 1.7.10.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org